Showing posts with label qualitative evaluation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label qualitative evaluation. Show all posts

Monday, February 11, 2013

PubMed Update December 2012 - January 2013


This is a really exciting time for research into overdose in general and naloxone in particular. 15 papers this time.

Walley AY, Xuan Z, Hackman HH, Quinn E, Doe-Simkins M, Sorensen-Alawad A, Ruiz S, Ozonoff A.
BMJ. 2013 Jan 30;346:f174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f174.
Comments: A long-awaited paper for which the authors deserve high praise, as they have produced the first real evidence of naloxone effectiveness and arguably the most important contribution to naloxone literature to-date. Although not randomized, the interrupted time series analysis is respectable and the results are impressive.

Coffin PO, Sullivan SD.
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jan 1;158(1):1-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-1-201301010-00003.
Comments: I’ve wanted to write this paper for about a decade, when I thought about cost-effectiveness as three to four calculations on the back of a napkin, rather than years of work and RAM-straining matrices. There’s a long way to go with overdose research that will certainly contribute to future iterations of the model. In the meantime, this is probably a fair, if quite conservative, initial estimate. There is one sensitivity analysis – in which naloxone results in behavior change such that overdose risk is lower – which I suspect may be closer to the actual truth.

Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jan 1;158(1):I-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-1-201301010-00001. No abstract available.
Comments: An excellent editorial from our colleagues at NIDA and the FDA.

4. Prescription opioid use among addictions treatment patients: Nonmedical use for pain relief vs. other forms of nonmedical use.
Bohnert AS, Eisenberg A, Whiteside L, Price A, McCabe SE, Ilgen MA.
Addict Behav. 2012 Nov 23;38(3):1776-1781. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.11.005. [Epub ahead of print]
Comments: Survey of prescription opioid use among treatment program patients. Use for reasons other than pain relief was associated with overdose as well as use of several other agents that increase the risk of overdose.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Program report: Overdose response in Yunnan, China

By: Nicholas Bartlett, Deming Xin, Hong Zhang, Bamian Huang

T
his month, an article that we researched and wrote last year, "A Qualitative Evaluation of a Peer-Implemented Overdose Response Pilot Project in Gejiu, China," has become available online in the International Journal of Drug Policy. The article reports on the experiences from Huyangshu, a harm reduction NGO based in Yunnan that has been offering naloxone in China through an emergency overdose response hotline service since 2008.

We conducted qualitative interviews with 30 clients, including 15 individuals who received naloxone injections to reverse an overdose and 15 individuals who called the hotline in response to the overdose of a peer. Clients pointed to a number of local structural shifts, including the aging of the opiate using population and drug mixing practices, that contribute to the city’s overdose toll. The article offers reflections on the program's implementation to date and considerations about how to improve in the future.